BBEST 2011
Resume:78-2


Poster (Painel)
78-2Furrowing soil for planting sugarcane increases CO2 emission more than N fertilizer application
Authors:VARGAS, V.P. (IAC - Instituto Agronômico) ; CANTARELLA, H. (IAC - Instituto Agronômico) ; MONTEZANO, Z.F. (IAC - Instituto Agronômico) ; SCILLA, F. (IAC - Instituto Agronômico) ; ANDRADE, C.A. (EMBRAPA - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária - Meio Ambiente) ; ROSSETO, R. (APTA - Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios) ; GAVA, G.J.C. (APTA - Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios) ; CARMO, J.B. (UFSCAR - SOROCABA - Universidade Federal de São Carlos - Campus Sorocaba)

Resume

The CO2 fluxes from soil were evaluated during the plant cane cycle as a function of urea N fertilization and inoculation with diazotrophs (IN) in two locations: Jaú (sandy loam soil) and Piracicaba (clay soil). The gas flow was measured in static chambers installed in the rows and midrows in treatments with the following N rates, in kg ha-1: 0 (control), 0 + IN, 60, 60 + IN, and 90. In the first four days after planting, samples were collected daily, then every four days until the first month and monthly thereafter. There was a strong temporal pattern in CO2 emissions, probably reflecting changes in environmental conditions. Nitrogen fertilization did not influence the flow of CO2 in the two sampling sites in all evaluations undertaken between April 2010 and May 2011. However, increased emissions of CO2 were associated with planting line of sugarcane. In all evaluations in Jaú CO2 fluxes were higher (p<0.01) when measured on the planting line. The CO2 fluxes ranged from 0.30 (±0.12) to 0.99 (± 0.17) g CO2-C m-2 day-1 in the planting lines and 0.15 (± 0.07) to 0.57 (± 0.18) g CO2-C m-2 day-1 in the midrows. In Piracicaba, CO2 emission had slightly different behavior, probably due to soil moisture. With increased water filled pore space in the line flows were higher (rline~0.20; p<0.01). The CO2 fluxes ranged from 0.22 (± 0.07) to 0.85 (± 0.08) g CO2-C m-2 day-1 in lines and 0.24 (± 0.06) to 0.65 (± 0.08) g CO2-C m-2 day-1 between the lines. The emission in the plant row was 2 and 1.5 times higher than that of the midrow, in Jaú and Piracicaba, respectively, probably because of soil disturbance due to furrowing for planting sugarcane. Root activity also have contributed to higher fluxes in the line. These differences should be considered in emission inventories of CO2.


Keyword:  Sugarcane ethanol sustainability, Greenhouse gases emission, Global warming, Nitrogen